Thermo-Hydraulic Performance and Energy Efficiency of Hybrid Nanofluids in Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review

Jasmine A. Hussein

doi:10.71229/zjp26442

Authors

Jasmine A. Hussein Energy and Renewable Energies Department, college of engineering, Al-Iraqia University, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71229/zjp26442

Keywords:

hybrid nanofluid, heat exchanger, exergy, Nusselt number , friction factor , pressure drop

Abstract

The study of hybrid nanofluids — which are a mixture of two or more dissimilar nanoscale solids in the conventional liquid — is underway as a tunable heat-transfer fluid for compact and high duty heat exchangers. Unlike the base fluid they are engineered to have higher thermal conductivity, but more important, a controllable ratio of conductivity, heat capacity, viscosity, stability, surface interaction and cost. This review critically assesses that balance in terms of thermo-hydraulic and energy-efficiency. The literature is structured on the preparation and stability, models for thermophysical properties, flow and heat transfer mechanisms, configuration of heat exchanges, penalties on pressure drop, efficiency criteria, first- and second-law efficiency, numerical modelling, machine learning and scale-up. The evidence suggests that hybridization may be useful for providing a valuable thermal synergy, especially if a highly conductive carbonaceous phase is mixed with a stable metal or metal-oxide phase. Nevertheless, energy requirement is not necessarily lower when there is an increase in conductivity. However, this can be offset by viscosity increase, aggregation, fouling, lack of property relations and incomplete accounting for pumping power. The best performance is typically obtained when the particle loading is low to moderate (heat transfer improvement outweighs hydraulic penalty) in all types of exchangers: across plate, double-pipe, shell-and-tube, compact finned, spiral, coil and triple-tube. This review demonstrates the invalidity of comparisons when the Reynolds number is equal or when the flow rate is equal and suggests that comparisons should be made at the same heat duty, pumping power and exchanger volume. It also works to create a reporting system that connects colloidal characterization to impacts on heat-exchanger performance and effect on the life cycle. The main finding is that hybrid nanofluids should be designed as system working fluid rather than just based on thermal conductivity. Long duration stability tests, uncertainty-aware correlations, validated multiphase models, standardized thermo-hydraulic metrics, corrosion and erosion data, safe handling protocols and demonstration under realistic duty cycles at pilot scale are needed to pave the way for future progress.

References

[1] Choi SUS, Eastman JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 1995; San Francisco, USA. Argonne National Laboratory report ANL/MSD/CP-84938.

[2] Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Applied Physics Letters. 2001;78:718-720. doi:10.1063/1.1341218.

[3] Sarkar J, Ghosh P, Adil A. A review on hybrid nanofluids: Recent research, development and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;43:164-177. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.016.

[4] Sundar LS, Sharma KV, Singh MK, Sousa ACM. Hybrid nanofluids preparation, thermal properties, heat transfer and friction factor - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;68:185-198. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.108.

[5] Huminic G, Huminic A. Hybrid nanofluids for heat transfer applications - A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2018;125:82-103. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.04.059.

[6] Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Review on mono and hybrid nanofluids: Preparation, stability, thermophysical properties and applications in heat exchangers. Energies. 2023;16:3189. doi:10.3390/en16073189.

[7] Babar H, Wu H, Zhang W, Shah TR, McCluskey D, Zhou C. The promise of nanofluids: A bibliometric journey through advanced heat transfer fluids in heat exchanger tubes. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2024;325:103112. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103112.

[8] Kakac S, Liu H, Pramuanjaroenkij A. Heat Exchangers: Selection, Rating, and Thermal Design. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020.

[9] Shah RK, Sekulic DP. Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.

[10] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.

[11] Maxwell JC. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1873.

[12] Hamilton RL, Crosser OK. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals. 1962;1:187-191. doi:10.1021/i160003a005.

[13] Brinkman HC. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1952;20:571. doi:10.1063/1.1700493.

[14] Buongiorno J. Convective transport in nanofluids. Journal of Heat Transfer. 2006;128:240-250. doi:10.1115/1.2150834.

[15] Yu W, Choi SUS. The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: A renovated Maxwell model. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2003;5:167-171. doi:10.1023/A:1024438603801.

[16] Xuan Y, Roetzel W. Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2000;43:3701-3707. doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(99)00369-5.

[17] Corcione M. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Conversion and Management. 2011;52:789-793. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.072.

[18] Vajjha RS, Das DK. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity of three nanofluids and development of new correlations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2009;52:4675-4682. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.06.027.

[19] Timofeeva EV, Routbort JL, Singh D. Particle shape effects on thermophysical properties of alumina nanofluids. Journal of Applied Physics. 2009;106:014304. doi:10.1063/1.3155999.

[20] Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar HSC. A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2011;54:4051-4068. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.04.014.

[21] Asadi A, Alarifi IM, Foong LK. An experimental study on characterization, stability and dynamic viscosity of CuO-TiO2/water hybrid nanofluid. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2020;307:112987. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112987.

[22] Hemmat Esfe M, Abbasian Arani AA, Rezaie M, Yan WM, Karimipour A. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Ag-MgO/water hybrid nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2015;66:189-195. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.06.003.

[23] Borode A, Ahmed N, Olubambi P. Stability and thermophysical properties of GNP-Fe2O3 hybrid nanofluids. Nanomaterials. 2023;13:1238. doi:10.3390/nano13071238.

[24] Jana S, Salehi-Khojin A, Zhong WH. Enhancement of fluid thermal conductivity by the addition of single and hybrid nano-additives. Thermochimica Acta. 2007;462:45-55. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2007.06.009.

[25] Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M. Effect of Al2O3-Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in heat transfer. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2012;38:54-60. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.11.007.

[26] Sundar LS, Singh MK, Sousa ACM. Enhanced heat transfer and friction factor of MWCNT-Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2014;52:73-83. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.01.012.

[27] Madhesh D, Kalaiselvam S. Experimental analysis of hybrid nanofluid as a coolant. Procedia Engineering. 2014;97:1667-1675. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.317.

[28] Huang D, Wu Z, Sunden B. Effects of hybrid nanofluid mixture in plate heat exchangers. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2016;72:190-196. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.11.009.

[29] Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Discrete phase numerical model and experimental study of hybrid nanofluid heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchanger. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2018;91:262-273. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.12.020.

[30] Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Experimentation on effect of particle ratio on hydrothermal performance of plate heat exchanger using hybrid nanofluid. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019;162:114309. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114309.

[31] Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Hydrothermal performance of different alumina hybrid nanofluid types in plate heat exchanger: Experimental study. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2020;139:3777-3787. doi:10.1007/s10973-019-08682-y.

[32] Bhattad A, Sarkar J. Hydrothermal performance of plate heat exchanger with an alumina-graphene hybrid nanofluid: Experimental study. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2020;42:361. doi:10.1007/s40430-020-02459-3.

[33] Alklaibi A, Sundar LS, Chandra Mouli KV. Experimental investigation on the performance of hybrid Fe3O4 coated MWCNT/water nanofluid as a coolant of a plate heat exchanger. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2022;171:107249. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107249.

[34] Fazeli I, Emami MRS, Rashidi A. Investigation and optimization of the behavior of heat transfer and flow of MWCNT-CuO hybrid nanofluid in a brazed plate heat exchanger using response surface methodology. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2021;122:105175. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105175.

[35] Sahoo RR, Sarkar J. Heat transfer performance characteristics of hybrid nanofluids as coolant in louvered fin automotive radiator. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2017;53:1923-1931. doi:10.1007/s00231-016-1951-x.

[36] Elibol EA, Gonulacar YE, Aktas F, Tigli B. Effect of using a ZnO-TiO2/water hybrid nanofluid on heat transfer performance and pressure drop in a flat tube with louvered finned heat exchanger. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2024;149:8665-8680. doi:10.1007/s10973-024-13346-7.

[37] Ahmed W, Kazi SN, Chowdhury ZZ, Johan MR. One-pot sonochemical synthesis route for ZnO@TiO2/DW hybrid/composite nanofluid for enhancement of heat transfer in a square heat exchanger. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2021;143:1139-1155. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-09362-y.

[38] Rostami S, Aghaei A, Hassani Joshaghani A, Mahdavi Hezaveh H, Sharifpur M, Meyer JP. Thermal-hydraulic efficiency management of spiral heat exchanger filled with Cu-ZnO/water hybrid nanofluid. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2021;143:1569-1582. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-09721-9.

[39] Bouselsal M, Mebarek-Oudina F, Biswas N, Ismail AAI. Heat transfer enhancement using Al2O3-MWCNT hybrid-nanofluid inside a tube/shell heat exchanger with different tube shapes. Micromachines. 2023;14:1072. doi:10.3390/mi14051072.

[40] Gaur SK, Sahoo RR, Sarkar J. Thermo-hydraulic performance investigation of triple-tube heat exchanger with MXene-based various shape hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2024;149:3071-3084. doi:10.1007/s10973-024-12887-1.

[41] Javadi H, Urchueguia JF, Ajarostaghi SSM, Badenes B. Impact of employing hybrid nanofluids as heat carrier fluid on the thermal performance of a borehole heat exchanger. Energies. 2021;14:2892. doi:10.3390/en14102892.

[42] Bejan A. Entropy Generation Minimization: The Method of Thermodynamic Optimization of Finite-Size Systems and Finite-Time Processes. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1996.

[43] Mahian O, Bellos E, Markides CN, Taylor RA, Alagumalai A, Yang L, et al. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-Part I: Fundamentals and theory. Physics Reports. 2019;790:1-48. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.004.

[44] Mahian O, Kolsi L, Amani M, Estelle P, Ahmadi G, Kleinstreuer C, et al. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-Part II: Applications. Physics Reports. 2019;791:1-59. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.003.

[45] Tiwari RK, Das MK. Heat transfer augmentation in a two-sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity utilizing nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2007;50:2002-2018. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.09.034.

[46] Pak BC, Cho YI. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental Heat Transfer. 1998;11:151-170. doi:10.1080/08916159808946559.

[47] Wang Y, Wang R, Peng Y, Tao Y, Shi L, Shi LX, et al. Evaluation methods of thermo-hydraulic performance in nanofluids: A comprehensive review. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2024;240:121989. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121989.

[48] Ali A, Noshad N, Kumar A, Ilyas SU, Phelan PE, Alsaady M, Nasir R, Yan Y. Application of machine learning algorithms in predicting rheological behavior of BN-diamond/thermal-oil hybrid nanofluids. Fluids. 2024;9:20. doi:10.3390/fluids9010020.

[49] Basu A, Saha A, Banerjee S, Roy PC, Kundu B. A review of artificial intelligence methods in predicting thermophysical properties of nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Energies. 2024;17:1351. doi:10.3390/en17061351.

[50] Zhu T, Mei X, Zhang J, Li C. Prediction of thermal conductivity of EG-Al2O3 nanofluids using six supervised machine learning models. Applied Sciences. 2024;14:6264. doi:10.3390/app14146264.

[51] Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2013;15:1692. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4.

[52] Gavankar S, Suh S, Keller AA. Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: Review and recommendations. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2012;17:295-303. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0368-5.

[53] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 318: Dispersion Stability of Nanomaterials in Simulated Environmental Media. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 3. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. doi:10.1787/9789264284142-en.

[54] International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 13014:2012 Nanotechnologies-Guidance on physico-chemical characterization of engineered nanoscale materials for toxicologic assessment. Geneva: ISO; 2012.

[55] International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 12885:2018 Nanotechnologies-Health and safety practices in occupational settings. Geneva: ISO; 2018.

[56] Minea AA. Challenges in hybrid nanofluids behavior in turbulent flow: Recent research and numerical comparison. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;71:426-434. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.072.

[57] Vallejo JP, Prado JI, Lugo L. Hybrid or mono nanofluids for convective heat transfer applications: A critical review of experimental research. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2022;203:117926. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117926.

[58] Muneeshwaran M, Srinivasan G, Muthukumar P, Wang CC. Role of hybrid-nanofluid in heat transfer enhancement-A review. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2021;125:105341. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105341.

[59] Tekir M. Experimental study on the thermal performance of hybrid nanofluid in a compact plate heat exchanger under the influence of a magnetic field. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2025;69:106031. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2025.106031.

[60] Hassaan AM. Evaluating experimentally the viability of employing hybrid nanofluids as an operating fluid in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:4030. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87149-7.

[61] Kumar KR, Chandan MR, Kiran B, Shaik AH. Novel Cu-MXene hybrid nanofluids for the experimental investigation of thermal performance in double pipe heat exchanger. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:9937. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94330-5.