Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence Framework for Real-Time Optimization of Honeycomb Panel Geometry and Mechanical Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71229/wx7czg04Keywords:
Digital Twin, Honeycomb Sandwich Panel, Phase-Change Material (PCM), Nonlinear Optimization; , Finite Element Simulation; , Multi-Objective Design; , Real-Time Structural Monitoring.Abstract
Light-weight sandwich panels filled with phase-change material (PCM) with honeycomb cores have been found to have a great potential for aerospace, automotive, construction, and thermal-management applications due to their combination of mechanical stiffness, energy absorption, and high thermal-energy-storage capacity. The thermo-mechanical coupled response of such panels is, however, strongly nonlinear and depends on the cellular geometry, the thickness of the walls, the height of the cores, the relative density, and the applied pressure and thus forcing conventional trial-and-error or single-physics finite-element based design cycles to be slow and costly. An integrated Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence (AI) framework for the real-time optimization of the geometry and mechanical performance of honeycomb panels is presented in this paper. A parametric nonlinear analytical-numerical model was developed that correlates deformation, von Mises stress, safety factor, stiffness, PCM heat storage capacity, thermal resistance and a composite score of multi-objectives to cell side length, wall thickness, core height, relative density and pressure load. A large design of experiments (DoE) database containing 4320 nonlinear designs was created and mined to generate nonlinear response surfaces, Pareto type performance maps and a ranked set of optimum designs. On top of the physics-based model, a “digital twin” layer was then developed, and a lightweight artificial-intelligence (AI) surrogate proof-of-concept was generated that reproduces the time-dependent stress, deformation, and temperature histories with less than 2% instantaneous deviation from the same physics-based reference signals used to define it; this illustrates the feasibility of near real-time monitoring and prediction of the panel's behavior under service loading, pending training and validation on independent, real sensor data. The results reveal that the reduction of the cell side length coupled with the increase of wall thickness results in a dramatic increase of stiffness and safety factor, but at the same time the mass increases; the von Mises stress field shows a strong nonlinear interaction between cell geometry and pressure load, while the optimal 20 designs have a common range of cell sizes (3–5 mm) and wall thicknesses (more than 1.0 mm) and core height (around 10 mm), with optimized scores exceeding 20. The proposed digital twin/AI framework greatly reduces the frequency with which full-scale simulation is required for design screening and lays groundwork toward real-time structural health monitoring and thermal monitoring once experimentally validated, and offers a transferable methodology for concurrent mechanical-thermal optimization of cellular sandwich structures, presented here as an analytical-parametric proof-of-concept rather than a fully validated finite-element or experimentally confirmed digital-twin deployment. A dedicated verification study (Section 3.11) further shows the top-ranked design and overall ranking to be reasonably robust to the score weights and correction-factor constants (Spearman rank correlation ≥ 0.94), reports a reduced-order finite-difference cross-check of the stiffness formula that motivates further three-dimensional FEM validation, and demonstrates a genuinely trained AI surrogate achieving below 2% relative error on held-out, previously unseen design cases.
References
[1] Ahmed, R., Dola, I. S., Ahmed, S., Rahman, M. M., Shanto, T. A., & Taylor, R. (2026). A review of design and fabrication strategies for thermoplastic lightweight thin-walled stiffened shells and lattice structures utilizing fused-filament fabrication (FFF). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 144(9-10), 6111-6158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-18078-6
[2] Chibinyani, M. I., Dzogbewu, T. C., Maringa, M., & Muiruri, A. (2024). Lattice Structures Built with Different Polygon Hollow Shapes: A Review on Their Analytical Modelling and Engineering Applications. Applied Sciences, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041582
[3] Che, S., Qu, G., Wang, G., Hao, Y., Sun, J., & Ding, J. (2024). A Review of the Biomimetic Structural Design of Sandwich Composite Materials. Polymers, 16(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202925
[4] Tuninetti, V., Narayan, S., Rios, I., Menacer, B., Valle, R., Al-Lehaibi, M., … Garrido, C. (2025). Biomimetic Lattice Structures Design and Manufacturing for High Stress, Deformation, and Energy Absorption Performance. Biomimetics, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10070458
[5] Ben Amor, S., Elloumi, N., Eltaief, A., Louhichi, B., Alrasheedi, N. H., & Seibi, A. (2024). Digital Twin Implementation in Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Processes, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061062
[6] Cascino, A., Nencioni, L., Lanzillo, L., Mazzeo, F., Strano, S., Terzo, M., … Meli, E. (2026). Development and Experimental Validation of a Physics-Based Digital Twin for Railway Freight Wagon Monitoring. Sensors, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020643
[7] Mutlu, U., & Kaewunruen, S. (2026). Digitalised Predictive Maintenance in Railways: A Systematic Review of AI, BIM, and Digital Twins. Infrastructures, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11030087
[8] Veera Siva Reddy, B., Chandrasekhara Sastry, C., Hafeezur Rahman, A., & Cep, R. (2026). Neural digital twin-enabled interpretation and optimization of high-strain-rate deformation in LPBF A286 lattice structures. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 42, 7761-7780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.05.082
[9] Xu, J., Wang, L., Gao, M., Jia, C., Chen, Q., Wang, K., … Fei, S. (2024). Deformation Evolution and Perceptual Prediction for Additive Manufacturing of Lightweight Composite Driven by Hybrid Digital Twins. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-024-01108-3
[10] Sajadieh, S. M. M., & Noh, S. D. (2025). From Simulation to Autonomy: Reviews of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 12(5), 1597-1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-025-00750-z
[11] Zhao, X.-W., Tong, X.-M., Ning, F.-W., Cai, M.-L., Han, F., & Li, H.-G. (2025). Review of empowering computer-aided engineering with artificial intelligence. Advances in Manufacturing, 14(1), 103-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-025-00545-0
[12] Sarfarazi, S., Mascolo, I., Modano, M., & Guarracino, F. (2025). Application of Artificial Intelligence to Support Design and Analysis of Steel Structures. Metals, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/met15040408
[13] Scarselli, G., & Nicassio, F. (2025). Machine Learning for Structural Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: A Review. Sensors, 25(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25196136
[14] Choi, W., Liman, M. L. R., Tajik Hesaramiri, M., Dahotre, N., Advincula, R. C., & Jiang, Y. (2026). Artificial intelligence in 3D printing: Unlocking the potential of 2D nanomaterial–polymer composites. MRS Communications. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-026-00980-5
[15] Niu, H., Yin, F., Kim, E. S., Wang, W., Yoon, D. Y., Wang, C., … Kim, N. Y. (2023). Advances in flexible sensors for intelligent perception system enhanced by artificial intelligence. InfoMat, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12412
[16] Geng, R., Jiang, J., Du, P., Zhang, H., Yu, R., & Gao, W. (2025). Multiscale thermal optimization of 3D-printed walls: integrating structure, material, and process with fire-thermal synergy. City and Built Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44213-025-00066-3
[17] Demiral, M., Mamedov, A., & Köklü, U. (2026). Engineering Applications of Biomechanics in Medical Sciences: Insights from Musculoskeletal and Cardiovascular Systems—A Narrative Review of the 2020–2026 Literature. Eng, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050235
[18] Hassanen, S. M., Seid Ahmed, Y., Al Momani, B., & Milani, A. (2026). A review of additive manufacturing techniques for wind turbine blade production: capabilities, AI integration, and Scale-Up Potential. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2026.1781579
[19] Nguyen-Van, V., Dai, M., & Dang, B.-L. (2026). 3D concrete printing for digital construction: Materials, process integration, and emerging performance paradigms. Materials and Emerging Technologies for Sustainability, 02(01). https://doi.org/10.1142/s3060932126300015
[20] Shirzad, S., Kassab, A., Chakraborty, A., Pannier, C., Hu, Z., Ayoub, G., & Mohanty, P. (2025). Influence of infill architecture on shrinkage, microstructure, and mechanical properties in paste extrusion 3D printed stainless steel. Materialia, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2025.102565
[21] Subramani, R., Leon, R. R., Nageswaren, R., Rusho, M. A., & Shankar, K. V. (2025). Tribological Performance Enhancement in FDM and SLA Additive Manufacturing: Materials, Mechanisms, Surface Engineering, and Hybrid Strategies—A Holistic Review. Lubricants, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13070298
[22] Le, V., Tran, M., & Ding, S. (2024). Subtractive manufacturing of composite materials with robotic manipulators: a comprehensive review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 135(1-2), 81-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14427-5
[23] Stanley, A. O., Rusnáková, S., Ogunleye, R. O., & Ajayi, N. E. (2025). Optimization of compression moulding technology for laminar composites: An overview. Next Research, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.101027
[24] Malashin, I., Martysyuk, D., Tynchenko, V., Gantimurov, A., Nelyub, V., & Borodulin, A. (2025). Data-Driven Optimization of Discontinuous and Continuous Fiber Composite Processes Using Machine Learning: A Review. Polymers, 17(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182557
[25] Reinke, G., & dos Santos, A. C. (2026). A systematic review and unified framework for design for additive manufacturing (DfAM). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 143(9-10), 4507-4535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-17632-6
[26] Ali, M. A., Irfan, M. S., Khan, T., Khalid, M. Y., & Umer, R. (2023). Graphene nanoparticles as data generating digital materials in industry 4.0. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 4945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31672-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Al-Noor Journal of Engineering Management and Computer Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





