Assessing the Environmental Quality Using RSEI in a Part of AnNajaf Governorate, Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71229/p5pegy53Keywords:
RSEI, , principal component analysis,, spatial autocorrelation analysis,, satellite remote sensingAbstract
Assessing environmental quality across large regions is essential for environmental monitoring and protection. Effective methods for measuring and detecting ecological changes are becoming increasingly important. Remote sensing techniques can serve as a viable alternative for evaluating spatial variations in ecological environmental quality EEQ. Landsat-8 OLI data from 2015 to 2025 were used to develop the remote sensing ecological index RSEI by combining the normalized difference vegetation index NDVI, the wetness index WET, the normalized difference built-up and soil index NDBSI, and the land surface temperature index LST through principal components analysis PCA. The results showed that the average RSEI values for 2015, 2020, and 2025 were 0.424, 0.539, and 0.623, respectively, denoting an improvement in the overall ecological environment of the study area. The Moran index values for these years were 0.733, 0.771, and 0.586, respectively, with a p-value of 0.000, denoting a strong positive correlation among environmental features. A decline in Moran's I suggests a slight shift in spatial distribution from a clustered pattern to a more random and dispersed one. The local clustering map of spatially correlated RSEI indicators indicated that hotspots are mainly located in the eastern part of the study area, while cold spots are clustered in the northern, southern, and western regions. The results indicated that the RSEI could play a significant supporting role in large-scale ecological monitoring and provide a scientific basis for the region's sustainable development goals. It also aids local governments in implementing suitable measures for the development of effective protection strategies.
References
1. Ren, W., Zhang, X., & Peng, H. (2022). Evaluation of temporal and spatial changes in ecological environmental quality on Jianghan Plain from 1990 to 2021. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 884440.
2. Hui, J., & Cheng, Y. (2024). Evolution and Spatiotemporal response of ecological environment quality to human activities and climate: case study of Hunan Province, China. Remote Sensing, 16(13), 2380.
3. Fang, G., Pablo, R. D. A., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Eco-environmental quality assessment using the remote sensing ecological index in Suzhou City, China. Sustainability, 15(17),
4. Kong, W., Chang, W., Xie, M., Li, Y., Wan, T., Nie, X., & Mo, D. (2024). Long-term monitoring and analysis of key driving factors in environmental quality: a case study of Fujian Province. Forests, 15(9), 1541.
5. Liu, Q., Yu, F., & Mu, X. (2022). Evaluation of the ecological environment quality of the Kuye River source basin using the remote sensing ecological index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12500.
6. Shan, Y., Dai, X., Li, W., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Qu, G., ... & Zeng, B. (2022). Detecting spatial-temporal changes of urban environment quality by remote sensing-based ecological indices: A case study in Panzhihua city, Sichuan Province, China. Remote Sensing, 14(17), 4137.
7. Yang, L., Shi, L., Wei, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Spatiotemporal evolution of ecological environment quality in arid areas based on the remote sensing ecological distance index: A case study of Yuyang district in Yulin city, China. Open Geosciences, 13(1), 1701-1710.
8. Xu HanQiu, X. H. (2013). A remote sensing index for assessment of regional ecological changes. 889-897.
9. Diep, N. T. H., Nguyen, N. T., Hieu, D. C., Huong, N. T. T., & Trang, D. H. (2024, May). Environmental Quality Monitoring Using Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) in Can Tho City, Vietnam. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1345, No. 1, p. 012018). IOP Publishing.
10. Xu, H., Wang, Y., Guan, H., Shi, T., & Hu, X. (2019). Detecting ecological changes with remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sensing, 11(20), 2345.
11. Hu, X., and Xu, H. (2018). A New Remote Sensing Index for Assessing the Spatial Heterogeneity in Urban Ecological Quality: A Case from Fuzhou City, China. Ecol. Indicators 89, 11–21.
12. Wang, J., Ding, J., Ge, X., Qin, S., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Assessment of ecological quality in Northwest China (2000–2020) using the Google Earth Engine platform: Climate factors and land use/land cover contribute to ecological quality. Journal of Arid Land, 14, 1196–1211.
13. Boori, M. S., K. Choudhary, R. Paringer, and A. Kupriyanov. 2021. “Spatiotemporal Ecological Vulnerability Analysis with Statistical Correlation Based on Satellite Remote Sensing in Samara, Russia.” Journal of Environmental Management 285:112138.
14. Karbalaei Saleh, S., Amoushahi, S., & Gholipour, M. (2021). Spatiotemporal ecological quality assessment of metropolitan cities: A case study of central Iran. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 193(5), 305.
15. Rahaman, Z. A., Kafy, A. A., Fattah, M. A., & Saha, M. (2024). Enhancing urban ecological risk assessment by integrating spatial modeling and machine learning for resilient environmental management in UNESCO World Heritage cities. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-30.
16. Mondal, S., & Gavsker, K. K. (2024). Investigating the urban eco-environmental quality utilizing remote sensing based approach: evidence from an industrial city of Eastern India. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(12), 666.
17. Tang, P., Huang, J., Zhou, H., Fang, C., Zhan, Y., & Huang, W. (2021). Local and telecoupling coordination degree model of urbanization and the eco-environment based on RS and GIS: A case study in the Wuhan urban agglomeration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103405.
18. Maity, S., Das, S., Pattanayak, J. M., Bera, B., & Shit, P.K. (2022). Assessment of ecological environment quality in Kolkata urban agglomeration, India. Urban Ecosystems, 25(4), 1137-1154. 19. Zhou, D., Zhang, L., Huang, L., Fan, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023). Satellite evidence for small biophysical effects of transport infrastructure in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 138002.
20. Ju, X. F., J. L. He, Q. Zhang, and S. Adilai. 2023. “Evolution Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Eco-Environmental Quality in Arid Oasis Belt-a Case Study of Oasis Core Area in Kashgar Delta.” Ecological Indicators 154:110866.
21. Aizizi, Y., Kasimu, A., Liang, H., Zhang, X., Wei, B., Zhao, Y., & Ainiwaer, M. (2023). Evaluation of ecological quality status and changing trend in arid land based on the remote sensing ecological index: A case study in Xinjiang, China. Forests, 14(9), 1830.
22. Al-Khakani, E. T., & Al-Janabi, W. F. (2023). Land surface temperature dynamics in response to changes in land cover in An-Najaf Province, Iraq. Korean J. Remote Sens., 39(1), 99-110.
23. Wijayanto, Y., Safitri, M., Purnamasari, I., Budiman, S. A., Saputra, T. W., Regar, A. F., & Ristiyana, S. (2024). Estimating the contents of Chlorophyll, Nitrogen, and yields on rice through Sentinel-2 vegetation indices in heterogeneous land management. The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 56(3), 357-367.
24. Liu, Q., & Shi, T. (2019). Spatiotemporal differentiation and the factors of ecological vulnerability in the Toutun River Basin based on remote sensing data. Sustainability 11 (15), 4160.
25. Gao, W., Zhang, S., Rao, X., Lin, X., & Li, R. (2021). Landsat TM/OLI-based ecological and environmental quality survey of the Yellow River Basin, Inner Mongolia Section. Remote Sensing, 13(21), 4477.
26. Liu, Q., Yu, F., & Mu, X. (2022). Evaluation of the ecological environment quality of the Kuye River source basin using the remote sensing ecological index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12500.
27. Chatterjee, R. S., Singh, N., Thapa, S., Sharma, D., & Kumar, D. (2017). Retrieval of land surface temperature (LST) from Landsat TM6 and TIRS data by a single-channel radiative transfer algorithm using satellite andground-based inputs. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 58, 264–277.
28. Yue, H., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Lu, Y. (2019). Eco-Environment quality assessment in China’s 35 major cities based on remote sensing ecological index. IEEE Access, 7, 51295–51311.
29. Wu, Y. J., Zhao, X., Xi, Y., Liu, H., & Li, C. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation and spatial-temporal changes of eco-environmental quality based on MODIS in Tibet during 2006–2016. Acta Geogr. Sin, 74, 1438-1449.
30. Li, J., Gong, J., Guldmann, J. M., & Yang, J. (2021). Assessment of urban ecological quality and spatial heterogeneity based on remote sensing: a case study of the rapid urbanization of Wuhan City. Remote Sensing, 13(21), 4440.
31. Chen, Y. (2023). Spatial autocorrelation equation based on Moran’s index. Scientific reports, 13(1), 19296.
32. Duo, L., Wang, J., Zhang, F., Xia, Y., Xiao, S., & He, B. J. (2023). Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution and drivers of ecological environment quality using an enhanced remote sensing ecological index in Lanzhou City, China. Remote Sensing, 15(19), 4704.
33. Al-Helaly, M. H., Alwan, I. A., & Al-Hameedawi, A. N. (2021, August). Land cover monitoring for Bahar-Najaf (Iraq) based on Sentinel-2 imagery. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1973, No. 1, p. 012189). IOP Publishing.
33. Hussein, A. K., Shiltagh, A. R., Mohammed, F. G., Abojassim, A. A., & Jassim, A. S. (2025). Monitoring Land Use and Land Cover Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, A Case Study: Kufa and Najaf, Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Science, 2603-2614.
34. Das, B., Boral, E., & Ray, T. K. (2025). Assessing urban environmental quality using remote sensing ecological index: insights from Agartala, Tripura, India. GeoJournal, 90(5), 1-25.
35. Al-Khakani, E. T., & Hamid, H. M. (2023). Monitoring land cover dynamics utilizing a change vector analysis approach: a case study of Al Najaf Province, Iraq. Kuwait Journal of Science, 50(1B).
36. Ling, C., Zhang, G., Deng, X., Jiao, A., Chen, C., Li, F., Ma, B., Chen, X., Ling, H., 2022. A study on the drivers of remote sensing ecological index of Aksu Oasis from the perspective of spatial differentiation. Water. 14(24), 4052
37. MA MY, X. U. G. C. (2023). Urban ecological quality and statistical correlation analysis based on satellite remote sensing. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1171, No. 1, p. 012042).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Al-Noor Journal of Engineering Management and Computer Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





