Integrated Vibration Energy Harvesting and Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-Art Review of Electro-Mechanical Co-Design

Authors

  • Ali Taha Mohammed Mechanical Techniques Department, Amarah Technical Institute, Southern Technical University, Basra 62001, Iraq
  • Ahmed Hashim Kareem Mechanical Techniques Department, Amarah Technical Institute, Southern Technical University, Basra 62001, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71229/8bhpve03

Keywords:

vibration energy harvesting, piezoelectric shunt, nonlinear energy sink

Abstract

Vibration energy harvesters and vibration control devices have been typically designed as two distinct subsystems, one to harvest a small electrical output, and the other to reduce a mechanical response. The efficiency of the separation is becoming less and less efficient as the same electromechanical coupling which converts the strain or relative motion to electricity also alters the effective damping, stiffness, impedance and frequency response of the host structure. This paper summarizes the current status of integrated vibration energy harvesting and structural vibration control and focuses on co-design of the electro-mechanical systems. The field is organized for the review: transduction mechanism, integration architecture, control authority and bandwidth strategy. A unified energy-flow and coupled-dynamics framework is used to compare the performance of piezoelectric shunts, electromagnetic shunt dampers, energy-regenerative tuned mass dampers, nonlinear energy sinks, hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic devices, and triboelectric metamaterials and distributed piezoelectric metastructures. The overall finding is that performance should be judged in terms of a Pareto problem with respect to vibration response, harvested power, bandwidth, mass, control energy, reliability and implementation complexity, not on a single peak-power or attenuation norm. Passive systems and semi-active systems are most close to being practically deployed because they are self powered or nearly self powered and have a greater level of adaptability, but they will need to be carefully powered. Further advancements will rely on source-spectrum characterization, circuit-aware structural optimization, uncertainty quantification, durability testing and field testing and validation. A co design workflow is suggested to be developed to integrate mathematical models, multi-objective optimization and deployable sensing/ isolation systems.

References

1. Anton SR, Sodano HA. A review of power harvesting using piezoelectric materials 2003-2006. Smart Mater Struct. 2007;16(3):R1-R21. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R01.

2. Priya S. Advances in energy harvesting using low profile piezoelectric transducers. J Electroceram. 2007;19:165-182. doi:10.1007/s10832-007-9043-4.

3. Erturk A, Inman DJ. An experimentally validated bimorph cantilever model for piezoelectric energy harvesting from base excitations. Smart Mater Struct. 2009;18(2):025009. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009.

4. Moheimani SOR, Fleming AJ. Piezoelectric transducers for vibration control and damping. London: Springer; 2006.

5. Yan B, Wang K, Hu Z, Wu C, Zhang X. Shunt damping vibration control technology: a review. Appl Sci. 2017;7(5):494. doi:10.3390/app7050494.

6. Cai Q, Zhu S. The nexus between vibration-based energy harvesting and structural vibration control: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;155:111920. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111920.

7. Li JY, Zhu S. Self-powered active vibration control: concept, modeling, and testing. Engineering. 2022;11:126-137. doi:10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.022.

8. Zuo L, Cui W. Dual-functional energy-harvesting and vibration control: electromagnetic resonant shunt series tuned mass dampers. J Vib Acoust. 2013;135(5):051018. doi:10.1115/1.4024095.

9. Zhu S, Shen WA, Xu YL. Linear electromagnetic devices for vibration damping and energy harvesting: modeling and testing. Eng Struct. 2012;34:198-212. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.024.

10. Ali A, Ahmed A, Ali M, Azam A, Wu X, Zhang Z, Yuan Y. A review of energy harvesting from regenerative shock absorber from 2000 to 2021: advancements, emerging applications, and technical challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(3):5371-5406. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-24170-7.

11. Muscat A, Bhattacharya S, Zhu Y. Electromagnetic vibrational energy harvesters: a review. Sensors. 2022;22(15):5555. doi:10.3390/s22155555.

12. Deng Z, Dapino MJ. Review of magnetostrictive vibration energy harvesters. Smart Mater Struct. 2017;26:103001. doi:10.1088/1361-665X/aa8347.

13. Anigbogu W, Bardaweel H. A metamaterial-inspired structure for simultaneous vibration attenuation and energy harvesting. Shock Vib. 2020;2020:4063025. doi:10.1155/2020/4063025.

14. Li M, Yu D, Li Y, Liu X, Dai F. Integrated a nonlinear energy sink and a piezoelectric energy harvester using simply-supported bi-stable piezoelectric composite laminate. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2023;156:104464. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2023.104464.

15. Wang L, et al. Study of vibration suppression and energy harvesting for a vibration-based piezoelectric-electromagnetic energy harvester with nonlinear energy sink. J Magn Magn Mater. 2024;602:172200. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172200.

16. Rezaei M, Talebitooti R, Liao WH, Friswell MI, et al. A comparative study on vibration suppression and energy harvesting via mono-, bi-, and tri-stable piezoelectric nonlinear energy sinks. Nonlinear Dyn. 2024;112:10871-10910. doi:10.1007/s11071-024-09562-3.

17. Lin Z, Al Baba’a H, Tol S. Piezoelectric metastructures for simultaneous broadband energy harvesting and vibration suppression of traveling waves. Smart Mater Struct. 2021;30:075037. doi:10.1088/1361-665X/ac0f8a.

18. Yuan M, Yu W, Jiang Y, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerator metamaterials for joint structural vibration mitigation and self-powered structure monitoring. Nano Energy. 2022;103:107773.

19. Chen K, Li Z, Tai WC, Wu K, Wang Y. MPC-based vibration control and energy harvesting using an electromagnetic vibration absorber with inertia nonlinearity. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference; 2020. doi:10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147503.

20. Pang Y, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerator-enabled digital twins in civil engineering. Adv Sci. 2024;11:e202306574. doi:10.1002/advs.202306574.

21. Xu Q, Sun R, Li J, Zhao X. Self-powered electromagnetic shunt damper for semi-active vibration control. Int J Mech Sci. 2025;305:110761.

22. Sun R, Wong W, Cheng L. Bi-objective optimal design of an electromagnetic shunt damper for energy harvesting and vibration control. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2023.

23. Du Y, Deng JL, Li P, Wen YM. Energy transfer and redistribution: an approach for unifying vibrational energy harvesting and vibration attenuation. Nano Energy. 2020;78:105245.

fig 2

Downloads

Published

2026-10-18

Issue

Section

Review Papers

How to Cite

Integrated Vibration Energy Harvesting and Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-Art Review of Electro-Mechanical Co-Design. (2026). Al-Noor Journal of Engineering Management and Computer Science, 3(1), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.71229/8bhpve03

Similar Articles

1-10 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.